Monday, January 18, 2010
Afghanistan National Anthem
Monday, September 28, 2009
Mughal Empire
From the reading over the Mughal Empire that I did, I get the idea that the text book is trying to make this man Akbar seem like a very nice and accepting guy. There is no doubt that he is a very accepting man, because he did accommodate foreigner as much as he could, but what were his intentions of doing this?
I get the feeling that Akbar only did these nice deeds to everyone only because he wanted to be accepted by everyone. This seems very selfish because he should actually want to do it, because it really matters to him. He should not only do something because It is what is best for himself.
Even though Akbar might have done these good deeds because it was in his best interests, ultimately his actions helped shape a very accepting community. By him accepting the Hindus, other cultures came such as the turks, because they knew that they would be accepted there. This boosted the mughal economy and it thrived throughout Akbar's rule. Once Akbar died, Aurandzeb took over, and completely reversed what Akbar was doing, by banning traditions of other religions other than muslims, and also by implying the Jizya tax, a non-believer tax, he completely destroyed the mughal empire. He made the empire so weak, that after he died, Britain took over with ease.
Ottoman's Constantinople Invasion
Something that was mentioned during the Ottoman Empire reading was the fall of Constantinople. The brief comment about the Ottoman siege on Constantinople in Strayer's Ways of the World left me wondering, how was it that such a great capitol was taken over this easily by the Ottomans?
This once prosperous capitol of the Byzantine Empire was conquered by the Ottoman Empire during April 5, 1453 through May 29, 1453. It was a really well planned out attack that the Ottomans led, and the army protecting constantinople was greatly outnumbered.
The seizer of constantinople took everyone by surprise, because the Muslims weren't the biggest threat to anyone. It was usually the Europeans that started all of the wars between themselves and the Muslims but now this Turk powered Ottoman Empire was relentless and overpowering. They started by first setting up forts along Dardanelles, a neighboring city to Constantinople, and then all at once they had the 80,000 to 200,000 men march to constantinople. The army protecting Constantinople was greatly outnumbered, as they only totaled to 7,000 men, while the Ottomans had 80,000 to 200,000 men. The majority of the Ottomans started by firing at the walls, while a small number of them went of to seize the less populated areas of Constantinople. The plans of the Ottomans to simple get in by firing at the walls did not work at all, and at one point the Ottomans tried to peacefully deal with the situation, and they offered to stop the conquest if the city was given to them. Then when this offer was denied by the Byzantine Empire, a massive wave of Ottomans charged at the walls, but they did not manage to enter the great city. After that wave, the city of Constantinople was hit by a second wave of Ottomans, and this wave did manage to breach a section of the walls. Shortly after that, the Ottomans discovered an unlocked gate, and they quickly flooded the city, ending the seizer. This picture here show the flood of the Ottomans into Constantinople. And that is how the Ottomans managed to take over this very powerful city of Constantinople.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Mughal Empire: Muslims and Hindus
Friday, September 25, 2009
Mughals
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Sunni/Shiite Hostility Old and New
Safavid Empire Research
The Ottoman Empire
The Ottoman Empire
The Ottoman Empire
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Investigating the Founders of the Mughal Empire
The Ottoman Empire
The Ottoman Empire
The Mughal Empire
I came upon a site that gave me my answers. The article in BBC "Aurangzeb" said that the empire came down because of Emperor Aurangzeb. Before his time there was a tolerance policy which allowed Muslims and Hindus to live at peace with one and other. Also there was no taxes to non-Muslims. Then when Aurangzeb came into power he brought the empire to its highest but it also fell profoundly afterwards. Aurangzeb broke the tolerance policy and tore down Hindu shrines he also started taxing the Hindu subjects. During his time his military power was at its highest but he had conquered to much land causing unstability. Also because of the conflict between the Hindu he gained more enemies. Even though the Emperor Aurangzeb brought the Mughal Empire to its highest and largest, after his reign the Mughal went into a down fall.
Strayer Ottoman/Safavid summary
Blog It! reading 378-382
This Isn't my Blog Entry
Response to Elle's, "Muslims, Christians, and the Ottoman Empire."
You began by asserting that Islam (specifically the Ottoman Empire) and Christianity became more strict and responsible as time passed. However, you provided no evidence to support your claim. Instead, you quickly moved on to discussing Columbus' explorations of the New World, and the harshness of devshirmes; neither of which relates at all to the development of responsibility or strictness in Christian or Muslim civilizations.
In fact, I would consider the kidnapping of young children to be an irresponsible act, yet it continued for roughly half of Ottoman history. The devshirme system only fell out of practice in the 17th century because these positions were only available to slaves, and those who were already at the upper echelon of society wanted to maintain political control within their own families (instead of giving away positions of power to slaves). Therefore, the Devshirme system fell apart due to a thirst for worsening the imbalance of power, not because the Ottomans strived to become a more responsible society.
Also, I find it difficult to accept your notion that an entity can become more responsible and strict simultaneously. When one becomes more responsible, strictness loses its purpose because they are sensible enough to make wise decisions. This concept is analogous to raising a child; as it grows up you don’t need to have as many rules for it, because it becomes more and more capable of taking care of itself.
Lastly, if you have evidence supporting the claim that the Ottoman Empire or Christianity (although due to its widespread nature and diversity, it could prove difficult to pinpoint its specific characteristics) became more strict and/or responsible as it developed through modern history, I’d love to hear it.
Muslims, Christians, and the Ottoman Empire
Around the time that the Islamic religion was overtaking almost every continent, Christopher Columbus in 1492 sailed to the Americas and became the first European to discover the Americas. There he found Native Americans and learned how to live on a new piece of land. He tookover the new land and called it home.
In addition, later on the Ottoman Empire started to allow Christians into their "elite" empire, but they were not treated the same as they treated the Jews. The Balkan Christians were required to hand over a certain amount of young boys who were removed from their families and forced to learn Turkish. After that, they were "usually" converted to Islam, but however it wasn't mandatory. After the young boys had been trained, they would then be ready for the civil administration or military service. As many families didn't like giving up their child, there was a benefit to it. The devshirme as they called it, meant that their family would take one step higher within the Ottoman Empire.
Lastly, the Ottoman Empire was a very manipulative type of government. For every young boy they took, that family would have to pay their cost into becoming higher in the empire. Therefore, the empire kept getting richer and richer.