Friday, November 6, 2009
Karl Marx
I thought the view of Karl Marx on the Industrial Revolution was refreshing. Instead of just viewing it as a time of technological advancement and urbanization, he saw it from the point of view of the workers. He felt that they were being treated unfairly and were being exploited. He recognized that there were two classes: the workers selling their labor, and the capitalists who were buying it. He saw that since workers were making the product that the factory workers were selling, the factory workers were paying the workers as little money as possible in order to make the largest profit. they were getting rich and sitting back, while the workers were spending long grueling days in the factory and being paid next to nothing for it. Marx said that the machine spread the working ability of the family, since it took away the value of strength. Workers just needed to be able to repeat the same motions all day, and the machines did the rest. this made it so that the man was paid less, and therefore the rest of the family was forced into working in order to earn enough money to support the family. even children were forced to work since strength and intelligence were not needed. He felt that the use of machines and lower wages to workers made the factory owners boatload of money, while the rest of society suffered. He believed it was time for the working class to revolt and rule society, Making everyone equal. It was socialism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't disagree with you, but I ask: Was it really socialism? I feel that Marx wanted it to be more equal by raising pay. Socialism in complete equality through any means, similar to communism. I think that socialism is not quite the best word for this. Socialism spans more than the Worker-Boss relationship, and leads into resources being available to everyone. So can we really call it Socialism?
ReplyDeleteI'm confused about what 'It' is. can you clarify. If by 'it' you mean the political/economic systems during the industrial revolution, then no, it was not socialism. If by 'it' you mean Marx's philosophy, then yes, Marx in fact advocated for the political theory known as socialism.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Austin in that this was not true socialism but more of the fees and wages of these people. In terms, by creating a more even disturbution of the money, equality was gained, which is one of the goals of socialism. But this equality was not gained through the relationship between the the boss and worked that socialism wants to establish. The outcome was almost the but the way of getting this outcome was some what different. Marx set out for equal pays while socialism wanted to establish a better worker boss relationship that would lead to better pays.
ReplyDelete